The James ossuary
GradeDisputed
Paul writes that he met "James the Lord's brother" (), and Mark names James among Jesus' brothers (). In 2002 a 1st-century limestone ossuary owned by the collector Oded Golan was made public, inscribed in Aramaic "James, son of Joseph, brother of Yeshua". The box itself is genuine, defence experts such as Krumbein argued that the patina on the inscription is ancient, and a forgery trial (2004-2012) ended in acquittal. The Christian point, though, does not depend on the box: James and his relationship to Jesus are already attested by Paul, who knew him personally, and by the Jewish historian Josephus, whom most scholars accept on this point.
Disputed. The box is genuine; the inscription, or part of it, is in doubt. Even if it were wholly genuine, it would at most be a possible ossuary of Jesus' brother, and it carries no weight. The historical case for James as Jesus' brother rests on Paul and Josephus.
Explore the counterarguments
In 2003 the Israel Antiquities Authority concluded that the inscription "is a modern forgery", and many epigraphers suspect that the words "brother of Yeshua" were added. The acquittal was for lack of proof, and the judge stressed that the verdict did not establish authenticity. All three names were common at the time, so even a genuine inscription would not securely point to Jesus' family. The box came from the antiquities market, not from an excavation.