James, "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ"
AuthenticityAuthentic
The Jewish historian Josephus, writing about 93-94 CE, records that in 62 CE the high priest Ananus convened the Sanhedrin and "brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others", and they were stoned. The overwhelming majority of scholars accept the passage as genuine. The phrasing is neutral, not what a Christian would write, and the episode makes sense within Josephus' account of Ananus. Josephus knew Jerusalem affairs directly, and this is a Jerusalem political story, so he did not need Christian informants for it. It confirms from outside the Church that Jesus was a real man, that he had a brother named James, and that Jesus was called "Christ". It also matches Paul, who met "James the Lord's brother" ().
Authentic. This is the strongest non-Christian witness that Jesus existed and was known as "Christ". It was written about 31 years after James' death and about 60 years after Jesus'.
Explore the counterarguments
The passage is short and incidental. It names Jesus only to identify James, and says nothing of his teaching, his death or the claims made about him. "Who was called Christ" records what Jesus was called, not anything Josephus himself believed. And though its authenticity is the overwhelming majority view, it is a majority, not a unanimous verdict.