Justus of Tiberias' chronicle
AuthenticitySilent
Silence is weak evidence. Justus' work was a concise chronicle of the Jewish kings, and Photius, the 9th-century scholar who read it, complained that Justus "omits a great deal that is of the utmost importance". Most figures of 1st-century Judea appear in no surviving source at all. What Justus left out is supplied by other outsiders: Josephus names Jesus and his brother James, and Tacitus records his execution under Pilate.
Silent. The chronicle is lost, and is known only from Photius' summary. Its silence about Jesus is recorded as context, and counts as weak evidence either way.
Explore the counterarguments
Justus was a Galilean Jewish historian writing about 100 CE, from Jesus' own region, and yet, as Photius noted, "he does not even mention the coming of Christ, the events of His life, or the miracles performed by Him." Critics also point to Philo of Alexandria (died about 50) as another Jewish writer of the time who does not mention Jesus.