The Acts of Pilate (Gospel of Nicodemus)
AuthenticityNot genuine
The case for Jesus' execution under Pilate does not need this work: the hostile Roman historian Tacitus records it (see O7). Justin Martyr (about 155) appealed to "the Acts of Pontius Pilate", but this is generally understood as his assumption that such official records existed, not a citation of a document he had seen. The surviving Christian Acts of Pilate is best read as a reply to a hostile, pagan "Acts of Pilate" which, according to Eusebius, was circulated under the emperor Maximinus Daia about 311-312.
Not genuine as an outside witness. It is an apocryphal Christian gospel, presented as eyewitness records from Pilate's headquarters, and its existing form dates to the 4th or 5th century. It is listed here because popular apologetics still sometimes cite "Pilate's report".
Explore the counterarguments
The work is Christian literature written centuries after the events, and no actual report by Pilate on Jesus is known to survive. Citing it as a Roman witness to the trial or the resurrection is a mistake.